Search for: "Officer John Doe(s)" Results 1 - 20 of 13,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2017, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under Rule 15(c)(1)(c), "lack of knowledge of a John Doe defendant's name does not constitute a mistake of identity," which means you have to name them before the statute of limitations runs out. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 10:05 am by Todd Janzen
  The article’s premise is based upon John Deere’s recent commentto the US Copyright Office that farmers who buy a new John Deere tractor are granted an implied license to operate a tractor for the duration of its life. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It is not enough to name the officer's employer, as Section 1983 does not recognize respondeat superior liability, that is, the employer is not automatically liable just because one of its employees violated the law. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 9:34 am by Walter Olson
Earlier on the Wisconsin John Doe raids, including this Cato piece. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 10:05 am by Todd Janzen
  The article’s premise is based upon John Deere’s recent commentto the US Copyright Office that farmers who buy a new John Deere tractor are granted an implied license to operate a tractor for the duration of its life. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  Here, presumably, the plaintiff will subpoena to eBay to discover the identity of "John Doe." [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:24 am
The "John Doe" defendant in this copyright infringement lawsuit allegedly used the BitTorrent file-sharing protocol to illegally download, copy and distribute elements of various works of Malibu Media's copyrighted material. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 pm by Ari Ezra Waldman
The bill currently being considered allows certain domestic abuse victims to sue as "Jane Does" or "John Does. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:00 pm by Dave Ratner
The Colorado Bar Association presents: The Copyright Office Speaks: The Offices Modernization Efforts and the Music Modernization Act.The Copyright Office is in the middle of fundamentally changing how it does business to meet the modern needs of its customers and users. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:34 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Five lawyers at The Law Offices of John Day have been recognized by Best Lawyers. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 8:19 am by Rob Robinson
Media Announcement HaystackID® Appoints John Brewer as Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer Appointment Emphasizes Reasoned and Responsible AI Integration in eDiscovery HaystackID, a specialized eDiscovery services firm, announced today the appointment of John Brewer as the company’s Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer (CAIO). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:57 pm
Indianapolis IN - Copyright lawyers for CP Productions, Inc. of Phoenix, AZ filed a copyright infringement declaratory judgment suit in alleging John Doe, an alleged serial infringer known at this time only by an IP address, infringed the copyrighted work "GH Hustlers - Maryjane's Second Visit" which has been registered by the US Copyright Office. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am by Russell Knight
Fictitious Names In An Illinois Divorce Illinois law allows any litigant to request to use a pseudonym like John Doe or Jane Doe. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:55 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
One question about Section Three concerns the President's oath of office. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
It doesn't excuse the alleged crime, especially in the minds of police who take these crimes very seriously, but it does show an element of taking responsibility for one's alleged actions. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 7:48 am
I just saw that long-time friend and colleague, John Heckman, has a legal technology blog now available called “Does it Compute? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
This follows up on something discussed on this blog a week ago in "John Doe prosecutor John Chisholm objects to what Stuart Taylor Jr. said about his anti-Walker vendetta" and "Did Stuart Taylor Jr. misidentify his unnamed source for his article impugning the motives of the John Doe prosecutor? [read post]